CHECKLIST FOR ASSESSING STUDENTS ATTITUDE
TOWARDS THE ENVIRONMENT
Sr.No.
|
Characteristics
|
Yes
|
No
|
1
|
Shows responsibility towards the environment
|
||
2
|
Is environmental Sensitive
|
||
3
|
Participates in school driven activities relating to care
for the environment
|
||
4
|
Participates in community driven activities relating to
care for the environment
|
||
5
|
Takes the initiative and plans activities directed towards the betterment of the
environment
|
||
6
|
Aware of the threats posed to nature by mankind
|
NUMERICAL RATING SCALE FOR ASSESSING STUDENTS ATTITUDE TOWARDS PEER
Name:_____________
Class:____________
Roll No.:___________
The Number represents the following values
1. Never 2. Seldom 3. Occasionally 4. Frequently 5. Always
(a) Shares a healthy rapport with peers
--------------------
1 2 3 4 5
(b) Is
able to interact effectively with peers
------------------ 1 2 3 4 5
(c) Respects and is sensitive to differences among
peers
-------------------- 1 2 3 4 5
(d) Is
able to express/contribute ideas and opinions in a group
---------------------- 1 2 3 4 5
(e) Is
receptive to ideas and opinions of others in a group
----------------------- 1 2 3 4 5
(f) Is kind and helpful
----------------------- 1 2 3 4 5
(g) Is able to inspire members of the peer
group
----------------------- 1 2 3 4 5
RUBRICS FOR DEBATE
Criteria |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Organization and
Clarity |
Unclear in most parts |
Clear in some parts but
not over all |
Most clear and orderly
in all parts |
Completely clear and
orderly presentation |
Use of Arguments |
Few or no relevant
reasons given |
Some relevant reasons
given |
Most reasons given:
most relevant |
Most relevant reasons
given in support |
Use of Examples and
Facts |
Few or no relevant
supporting examples/facts |
Some relevant
examples/facts given |
Many examples/facts
given: most relevant |
Many relevant
supporting examples and facts given |
Use of Rebuttal |
No effective
counter-arguments made |
Few effective
counter-arguments made |
Some effective
counter-arguments made |
Many effective
counter-arguments made |
Presentation Style: |
Few style features were
used; not convincingly |
Few style features were
used convincingly |
All style features were
used, most convincingly |
All style features were
used convincingly |
No comments:
Post a Comment